Quick little article discussing some of the history of tattoos throughout the world.
This is an interesting story. From all accounts I have read, Hernandez was examined by experts and found to have no gang related tattoos on his body. How exactly is this new rule going to help things if the worst offender in the league would have passed the inspection?
I have heard quite a few people say that most or all of the tattoos they see on people are crap. My response to this argument has always been that I agree, but that argument could be applied to pretty much any art form. There are millions of people in the world creating art in many forms, but not all of them are actually good at it. The art we see in museums, the music we hear on the radio, the movies that make the most money, and the tattoos that we see in magazines… These are all top tier of examples in each area respectively, but the other 90% that doesn’t get recognition is most likely crap.
Today I discovered that there is a term for this, and it’s called Sturgeon’s Law, or Sturgeon’s revelation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon’s_Law
I repeat Sturgeon’s Revelation, which was wrung out of me after twenty years of wearying defense of science fiction against attacks of people who used the worst examples of the field for ammunition, and whose conclusion was that ninety percent of SF is crud. Using the same standards that categorize 90% of science fiction as trash, crud, or crap, it can be argued that 90% of film, literature, consumer goods, etc. are crap. In other words, the claim (or fact) that 90% of science fiction is crap is ultimately uninformative, because science fiction conforms to the same trends of quality as all other artforms.
So there you have it. The next time someone claims that 90% of the tattoos they see are crap, I will nod my head in agreement and refer them to Sturgeon’s Law.
Don’t get lumped into that group! Do your research, plan your tattoo with a good artist and you can be part of the 10% with high quality ink.
Chief of Department Philip Banks issued a memo to the department’s 34,500 members ordering them to keep shoes shined, pants pressed and tattoos covered.
Another article talking about tattoo removal and just like every other similar story, there are some inflated tattoo regret figures thrown into the mix. This time claiming “Some stats say that half of all people with tattoos eventually want to get them removed.” Which stats? I need a source or else this is just a number that someone pulled out of their ass.
This type of inflated statistic on regret is especially annoying because people who are against tattoos will try to use it as further evidence that tattoos are a bad idea.